Independent review

Editorial Board

The disciplines that govern Your PT's higher-risk educational content and how named reviewers are verified.

Board coverage

Our board model covers the five disciplines below. A seat is not represented as filled until the individual’s identity, relevant credential, public professional profile, and conflict disclosure have all been verified.

  • Strength & coaching: Exercise technique, programming, progression, and coaching guidance.
  • Nutrition: General nutrition education, energy intake, protein, and nutrition-tool methodology.
  • Physiotherapy & sports medicine: Injury-related safety boundaries, return-to-training context, and referral language.
  • Statistics & research methods: Dataset methodology, uncertainty, evidence interpretation, and reproducibility.
  • Localization: Native-language accuracy, cultural fit, local units, and market-specific safety context.

Published members

No individual board member is currently published. We do not substitute a generic team label for professional review.

How review works

Reviewers work only within their published scope. Their profiles list the work they have reviewed, applicable disclosures, and external professional profiles. A reviewer’s name on a page means they reviewed that specific page on the stated date; it does not endorse unrelated pages or products.

Read the editorial policy, corrections policy, and the public authors and reviewers directory.

Frequently asked questions

What disciplines are represented on the Your PT editorial board?
Our board model spans five core areas: Strength and Coaching, Nutrition Education, Physiotherapy and Sports Medicine, Statistics and Research Methods, and Localization.
How are potential conflicts of interest handled for board reviewers?
All board members must provide public conflict-of-interest disclosures before publishing reviews. Reviewers recuse themselves from evaluating content connected to commercial affiliations.
Does editorial board review guarantee personal fitness outcomes?
No. Reviewers verify factual accuracy, safety boundaries, and evidence quality within educational materials. Content does not constitute individual medical or personalized training advice.